Advocating for Justice: Why the Proposed Medical Malpractice Court is a Crucial Win for T&T Consumers 🇹🇹
The conversation around healthcare in Trinidad and Tobago has long been shadowed by heartbreaking instances of medical negligence. For too many families, the pursuit of justice following a devastating error has been a lengthy, agonizing, and often financially crippling battle within the traditional court system. This is why the recent proposal in the T&T Budget for a dedicated Medical Malpractice Court is not just a policy change—it's a monumental step toward accountability and consumer protection.
Recalling the Cost of Negligence and the Fight for Redress
We must begin by acknowledging the real human cost that has driven this necessity. The names of those who sought care but instead found tragedy serve as a sobering reminder of the flaws in our current system and the urgent need for reform. Their victories, though essential, highlight the immense struggle required to hold institutions accountable for catastrophic and preventable errors.
We remember cases that shocked the nation, in approximate chronological order, and the size of the justice achieved:
Russel Tesiera (2004 Case/2022 PC Judgment): Died following prostate surgery at a private medical centre due to alleged failures in pre-operative assessment and post-operative monitoring of severe bleeding. His executrix was awarded over TT$18 million in damages.
Smokey Mckenzie (2009-2010 Case/2018 Judgment): Died after receiving a fatal radiation overdose during treatment at a private cancer centre, which was later found negligent. His family sought close to TT$20 million in compensation.
Patients at the Oncology Centre/Cancer Hospital: A group of approximately 200 patients, including Smokey Mckenzie, were affected by the same miscalibrated linear accelerator, leading to the risk of, or actual, serious complications and long legal battles against the institution.
Rana Ramlal Case: A woman was misdiagnosed at a public hospital, leading to the wrongful removal of her fallopian tubes and permanent infertility. The court ordered general damages of TT$300,000.
Patient Washed with Lye: In a truly shocking incident, a patient was washed with a lye solution while under anesthesia, resulting in severe and painful chemical burns. The patient was awarded general damages of TT$150,000 for the distress and injury suffered.
Crystal Boodoo-Ramsoomair (2011 Case): A 29-year-old mother who died hours after undergoing a Caesarean section at San Fernando General Hospital, with the subsequent legal action highlighting systemic and organizational failures.
These landmark cases underscore a painful truth: the successful pursuit of justice for negligence often comes with a decade-long wait and an unbearable financial and emotional toll. The magnitude of the financial awards reflects the severity of the loss, but the current judicial process itself remains a powerful argument for urgent judicial reform.
The Proposed Solution: A Dedicated Medical Malpractice Court
The proposal, as put forward in the T&T Budget, to establish a specialized Medical Malpractice Court is a direct response to the inherent difficulties of trying complex medical cases within the existing judicial framework. It is designed to be a fairer, faster, and more informed pathway to justice.
This new court aims to:
Streamline the Process: Medical malpractice cases are notoriously complex, requiring expert medical testimony and detailed analysis of clinical procedures. A specialized court would have judges trained or experienced in this specific area of law, leading to more informed and faster decisions.
Expedite Resolution: By dedicating a court and its resources solely to these matters, the crippling delays currently plaguing victims seeking compensation will be significantly reduced. Justice delayed is often justice denied, and this court offers a path to swifter closure and healing.
Ensure Consistency and Expertise: A specialized court will develop a coherent body of law and precedent specific to medical negligence in T&T, ensuring greater consistency and predictability in judgments for both patients and healthcare providers.
A Consumer Win: Enhanced Protection and Accountability
The true beneficiaries of this proposal are the people of Trinidad and Tobago—the healthcare consumers. A specialized court strengthens their position in several critical ways:
Elevated Accountability: Knowing that there is a swift, specialized court ready to address negligence acts as a powerful deterrent. It compels healthcare institutions to raise their standards of care and internal monitoring, ultimately fostering a culture of greater diligence within the public health sector.
Reduced Financial Burden: Lengthy legal battles drain the emotional and financial resources of victims already dealing with injury or loss. A faster, more efficient process means victims can access rightful compensation sooner, allowing them to cover ongoing medical costs and achieve financial stability more quickly.
Restored Faith in the System: When justice is transparent and accessible, it helps restore the public's trust in both the legal system and the national healthcare service. It sends a clear message that the state is serious about protecting its citizens from avoidable harm.
The Consumers Association of Trinidad and Tobago (CAIR) views the establishment of this court as a necessary and fundamental step toward upholding patient rights and improving judicial efficiency. It is a crucial infrastructural reform that will transform the landscape of patient safety and redress. This court is an investment in the dignity and rights of every patient in T&T. Let us champion this initiative and ensure it is implemented swiftly and effectively, finally giving victims the timely and informed justice they deserve.
Contact CAIR today:
.jpg)
Subscribe to our blog and contact CAIR on any of our pages:
